Waikiki Natatorium War Memorial» Statement

The fight for the Natatorium: On to the next round

natatorium — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:46:19 +0000

Mayor Hannemann has now endorsed his own task force’s recommendation that the Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium be razed.

This is hardly news. It was no surprise in September that an advisory panel appointed by the mayor would provide the advice he wanted to hear. It is no surprise now that he has adopted a recommendation that tracked so closely with his own often-expressed preference.

Hannemann’s so-called “partial preservation” plan would destroy the entire War Memorial — pool, bathrooms, bleachers, volleyball courts and parking lot — thereby wasting more than $4 million in completed, much-used improvements and restorative work. Hannemann’s plan for a facsimile of the arched doorway to be rebuilt inland is not preservation in any sense of the word.

Here are some things to remember:

The pool itself is the memorial tribute to the fallen of World War I. The arches are merely a decorative doorway to the War Memorial Natatorium. Rebuilding the door elsewhere is NOT preserving the memorial.
The fight to preserve the War Memorial is not over. The mayor won this round, in an arena of his own choosing. Preservationists, environmentalists and members of the Native Hawaiian, veteran, and ocean sport and safety communities will have a better shot at victory when the fight moves to venues that he does not control.
Those venues include administrative hearings and perhaps, eventually, the courts. The National Trust for Historic Preservation has pointed out that there are at least five federal environmental, commercial and historic preservation laws in the path of the mayor’s demolition plan. Together, the NTHP says, those statutes constitute “very significant legal constraints on any proposal to for the city to demolish the Natatorium.”
There is plenty that you can do to help save the Natatorium. You can write to the mayor and members of the City Council. You can write letters to the editors of the Advertiser and Star-Bulletin; tell them that you favor stabilizing the Natatorium and preserving it for eventual full restoration. You can contribute to the Friends of the Natatorium. And you can stay informed, by subscribing to this blog [see right-hand column on this page] or following us on Facebook or Twitter.

More details on why stabilization and preservation are the better alternative are available here. Thank you for your support.

Task force dissenting opinion: Read it and act

natatorium — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 11:01:19 +0000

Three more members of the Mayor’s Natatorium Task Force have joined the pro-Natatorium coalition, signing a dissenting opinion filed with the city today. The additions add important voices from the Native Hawaiian, veteran, and ocean sport and safety communities to the report’s call for stabilization and eventual restoration of the Natatorium.

The added members (who could not attend the task force’s final meeting Sept. 24) are Hannie H. Anderson, co-founder and race director of Na Wahine O Ke Kai; Art A. Caleda, president of the World War II Filipino-American Veterans of Hawaii; and Brian L. Keaulana, ocean safety expert, surfer and actor. They join task force members Fred W. Ballard, Donna L. Ching and Kiersten Faulkner in signing a powerful dissent laying out the financial, legal, historical and moral arguments that should compel Honolulu to immediately stabilize this state and national landmark and preserve it for future restoration to its intended use: a living memorial to military heroes from Hawai’i.

Here’s what we want you to do: Read the full dissent [click on the "Continue Reading" link for the text]. If you agree, send an e-mail message to Mayor Mufi Hannemann and tell him so. Tell him it would be wrong to demolish the Natatorium. Send a copy to your City Council member.

Then go to the right-hand column of this page and subscribe to this blog, join one of our Facebook pages or follow us on Twitter. Either way, you’ll stay informed about the fight to preserve and restore your Natatorium.

OK, here comes the link. Click on it, start reading… and act. Thank you!

Mayor’s Natatorium Task Force Dissenting Opinion

Stabilizing the pool is the most fiscally, environmentally and morally sensible course of action.

COST: Stabilizing is cheaper than demolishing

The City estimates it will cost $14 million to stabilize the Natatorium and preserve long-term options. Furthermore, stabilization would retain the use of essential restrooms and parking and add access to the now-closed bleachers where people could sit and enjoy a panoramic view of Mamala Bay and Waikīkī.

Demolition of the entire structure, including loss of the restrooms, bleachers, parking and volleyball courts, is conservatively estimated at more than $15 million. Repairing damage to the reef, replacing the demolished restrooms and showers would add another $2 million to that for a total of over $17 million. The loss of parking would most likely be unrecoverable.

REGULATORY AND LEGAL CHALLENGES: Stabilizing would have the most expedited permitting process. Demolition could face a protracted legal battle.

Proposals to demolish the historic structure will face regulatory, permitting and legal challenges that will be unpredictable, time-consuming, and expensive and cause additional delays.

In August, legal counsel from the National Trust for Historic Preservation issued a letter summarizing a lengthy list of state and federal laws and regulations that would have to be observed and approvals that would need to be obtained before demolition could begin. Among the applicable measures are the federal Rivers and Harbors Act, Clean Water Act, National Historic Preservation Act, National Environmental Policy Act, EPA regulations, and the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Additional discretionary permits include State Historic Preservation review, Coastal Zone Management, Environmental Impact Statement, Special Management Area Use Permit, Shoreline Setback Variance, and Special District Permit. Preservation advocates and veterans groups have pledged to steadfastly resist any attempts to demolish the war monument. Legal battles could add years to any demolition process and, in fact, might never result in final approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS: Stabilizing is safer than demolishing

Demolition of the Natatorium and creation of an artificial new beach risks destabilizing the existing Sans Souci beach; altering the sedimentation patterns on near-shore reefs, harming marine life and surf breaks; and causing beach erosion.

The debris from the demolition would take space in a landfill, and such demolition would cause the loss of embedded energy inherent in existing structures, as well as the expenditure of new energy for the conveyance of materials.

REDUCES LIABILITY: Stabilizing the Natatorium reduces the City’s liability from the deteriorating structure. Because it can be done quickly and without a protracted legal battle, stabilization would be the most efficient way to mitigate the city’s exposure to liability created by the deteriorating pool.

MORAL CHOICES: Demolition destroys a war memorial on the State and National Historic Registers.

Act 15 specifically states the “living” War Memorial is intended as a swimming pool. Demolishing the pool is demolishing the memorial itself. Reconstructing the arched façade elsewhere does nothing to preserve a memorial dedicated to the sacrifices of Hawai’i’s citizens who gave all in service to their communities, nation, and world.

Stabilizing preserves the option to restore the living war memorial to use, thereby properly honoring 102 servicemen from Hawai’i killed in World War I. It also preserves a piece of the history, architecture and culture of Hawai‘i and the nation.

Stewardship of the historic, cultural and natural resources of Hawai‘i is the ethical and moral obligation of the people of Hawai‘i.

TOURISM IMPACTS: The Natatorium could be a major tourism asset.

A preserved and eventually restored Waikīkī War Memorial Natatorium would be a vital part of Waikīkī’s “sense of place.” It is in the best interest of Hawai‘i to preserve its uniqueness and identity for the benefit of all its residents as well as its visitors.

RECOMMENDATION:

We, the undersigned members of the Mayor’s Task Force, support the immediate stabilization of the Waikīkī War Memorial Natatorium.

We recommend immediate completion of the abandoned 2005 plan to strengthen, repair and stabilize the structure’s frame (the sea walls and pool deck) and reopening of the bleacher area in order that residents and visitors have access to the War Memorial and spectacular makai vista.

We further recommend that the city engage in dialogue with state and federal agencies, non-profit organizations, business organizations and other stakeholders to craft a public-private partnership for the long-term rehabilitation, maintenance and operation of the facility.

Respectfully,

Hannie H. Anderson, Na Wahine O Ke Kai, Co-Founder and Race Director
Fred W. Ballard, Oahu Veterans Council, Executive Director
Art A. Caleda, WWII Filipino-American Veterans of Hawai‘i, President
Donna L. Ching, Friends of the Natatorium, Vice President
Kiersten Faulkner, Historic Hawai‘i Foundation, Executive Director
Brian L. Keaulana, Ocean Safety Expert

The fight goes on!

natatorium — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 01:18:54 +0000

By now you’ve heard that the mayor’s task force voted this week to support demolishing the Natatorium and replacing it with a beach.

This vote did not surprise us; the lines in the sand were drawn early. We knew that the battle was uphill, given that this was the mayor’s own task force and that the mayor advocates demolition.

The vote does nothing to change our position on preservation of the Natatorium. It does nothing to quell the vigor with which we are working to block attempts by the city to demolish the War Memorial.

If and when Mayor Hannemann takes steps to start demolition, he will find, as Friends of the Natatorium President Peter Apo told the news media after Thursday’s vote, that the legal path is “long and treacherous.” And we intend to be there every foot, yard and mile along the way.

In an August legal memorandum from the National Trust for Historic Preservation to the city, the mayor was cautioned that there are very formidable legal and administrative hurdles in place that protect the Natatorium.

It would cost $14 million to stabilize the structure, preserving long-term options, while retaining even in the short term the use of the restrooms and parking and adding access to the now-closed bleachers. The demolition of the entire structure, including loss of the restrooms, parking and volleyball courts, is conservatively estimated at more than $15 million. We believe stabilizing the pool makes fiscal as well as moral sense.

Stay tuned. The fat lady has yet to sing. This isn’t over yet.